The Fact About h4831sc load data That No One Is Suggesting
The Fact About h4831sc load data That No One Is Suggesting
Blog Article
Your session is about to timeout due to inactivity. Simply click OK to increase your time and efforts for an additional 0 minutes.
They've performed identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to obtain the more recent SC version but have now switched back. Ideally you'd like about 100% loading density. If you have ample case potential for the H4831(long) you're likely superior off.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo generates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps away from a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr pills, so It can be pleasant to obtain a person powder for both equally.
243, and many of the loads I've commenced with include, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I'm likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads to start with, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads clearly show a shotgun sample! Who knows, I just could locate a use for it In the end.
The only real distinction as I are aware of it would be that the SC was made to perform by powder actions much better (which it does). The more time grains never feed perfectly in any respect in a few steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Considering the fact that there does not seem like any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can many of you provide a starting point with this mix and factors to consider when Operating this Load up?
Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the sole real variance is that the shortcut meters better by reloading products. At the time It can be loaded theres no practical change. I've read that the shortcut can have a tiny bit faster burn off price but It appears insignificant.
Like reported above, exact same things. Everything differs is the size on the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they're going to only make the SC in the future. I have no idea if that may be genuine or not but would make sense to me. I use SC mainly because that is what I present in the eight lb jug and it really works.
With all the smoother flow features will come far more uniform demand weights, though the person grains orient extra h4831sc compactly, generating better loading density.
Ballistically, this Severe Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or small Slice. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to movement through the powder actions h4831sc load data a lot more efficiently, assisting to relieve the consistent reducing of granules.
If there is absolutely no load data it really is because this powder is not well suited for this cartridge. Usually one will not obtain one particular powder to fit all cartridges, and the family members of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you'll be asking about does not do the job. Click on to extend...
Back again to previous web page Shut If there is anything at all within your cart, it will not be introduced about to your previous web site.
I'm sure the H4831SC provides a better load density But I feel I have ample room in my scenario for the traditional H4831.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with lower to min fees. h4831sc I’m conversing 2700 (probably 2800) fps, it had been a minimal 60s grain charge inside of a Norma case. Not what I used to be trying to find, but accurate However.